Belief is the heart of the universe. But there is no quantification that tells you to explain yourself. The only thing that does not need your identity is the mindful. So if 1 do not ask for an explanation, what is consistent to what you need to understand to explain and to what? Nevertheless, the most controversial in this world is to justify ones statement. The ramifications of diverse thought that may be supportive is just a matter of creative dream works. Dream is also the nature of the sublime. So how does the materialistic version of its supportive argument gets construed. It is only the way people become is the difference. How does one qualify a human from the other.

Direct interactions among humans is not necessary to elucidate. Everything in this world is saturated to a point where we just have all the stories narrated and we just say yes or no to what we think is correct. So when this extravagant communication of explain the world to you for free syndrome happened. The probability of dream being supportive of religion is understood, but a dream being politically subversive to uphold a misfaith is not found yet. So my attempt is to spoil the simplistic and into complication so only a human can understand and the inhuman fails to see the business perspective of what I propose.

I believe there exist contradictions in the mind. This is often the heart of the intellectual. But, arguing relentlessly is the art of the subversive. The point is, that, it is often very difficult to understand life and Nature and God as to where we are going with our harmony. The more difficult is where are the digressed finding even the time and space to even argue their solidarity. With all jurisdiction I have followed the faith of complicating things for you and me. A human still has a chance to understand the complication but the other kind will have to drive their speculative time machines to understand how to live life and understand with undistinctive nature of the eternal bliss.

**Contents and Sample Pages**